Legal Opinion

Coy v. Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 29, 1995No. 94-CA-2356-MRPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GARDNER, Judge:

Linda L. Coy (Coy) appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Metropol*74itan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Metropolitan). We affirm.

On January 21,1993, a vehicle operated by Christopher F. Hovekamp (Hovekamp) struck another vehicle in which Coy was a passenger. Coy, who apparently was injured, was insured by Metropolitan under a policy which provided personal injury protection (PIP) or basic reparation benefits in accordance with Kentucky’s Motor Vehicle Reparations Act (MVRA). Coy’s policy with Metropolitan provided for a $250 deductible on PIP or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Steelvest, Inc. v. Scansteel Service Center, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1991
  3. Times-Mirror Co. v. Harden, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)1982
  4. Owensboro Cablevision, Inc. v. LibsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kentucky Unemployment Insurance Commission v. HamiltonKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kentucky Powder Company v. Donnie MayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API