Legal Opinion

Black v. Walker, Et Vir

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided September 15, 1939PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam. —

Defendant in error as plaintiff brought this action against the plaintiff in error as defendant to recover for services rendered defendant’s testatrix, who died in- 1931. There was a judgment for the plaintiff and defendant took writ of error.

It is contended that the claim is barred under Sub-section' 2 of Section 4648, Compiled General Laws of 1927, because action was not brought within two years from the issuance of letters testamentary.

The record discloses that the claim was filed within one year from the appointment of the executor, but after two years had expired, the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnes v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Ramseyer v. DatsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1935

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trueman Fertilizer Co. v. AllisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  2. Richards v. WestDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Minor v. LillardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  4. Bedell v. WilsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1955
  5. Baillargeon v. SewellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API