Legal Opinion · Concurrence

City & County of Denver v. Taylor

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 6, 1930No. 12,265Published

1ConcurrenceJustice Butler

I concur in the affirmance of the judgment. Though I do not dissent from the reason given in the principal opinion, it seems to me that there is a more satisfactory reason for affirmance.

Upon conflicting evidence, the jury found that during the entire period of sixty days immediately following the accident the plaintiff was in such physical or mental condition that she was unable to give notice, or cause notice to be given, within the time specified in the charter. She gave notice after the expiration of the sixty days. There are decisions denying recovery in such circumstances. See Baker v.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Barnes v. District of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Winter v. . City of Niagara FallsNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  3. McDonald v. City of Spring ValleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Murphy v. . Village of Fort EdwardNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  5. Walden v. . City of JamestownNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API