Kalfus v. Anderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Cohn, J. (dissenting).
The claim that the prosecution of an action imposes an undue burden on interstate commerce must be seasonably asserted. In this case defendants appeared generally and served and filed an answer containing a general denial and three affirmative defenses. Before moving to dismiss the action upon the ground that its prosecution in New York would impose an undue burden on interstate commerce, defendants litigated plaintiffs’ suit practically up to the eve of trial. Plaintiffs are residents of the city of New York and the suit is one over which the Municipal Court has…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Neirbo Co. v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Freeman v. Bee MacHine Co., IncSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Commercial Casualty Insurance v. Consolidated Stone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- International Milling Co. v. Columbia Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.