Tiedemann v. . Tiedemann
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
The facts found by the judge are set out in his order. These facts are sufficient to support the order. There was evidence at the hearing tending to sustain the findings of fact. The amounts which the defendant is required to pay for the reasonable subsistence of plaintiff, pendente lite, and for compensation to her counsel were determined by the judge in the exercise of his sound discretion. They are not subject to review by this Court. Anderson v. Anderson, 183 N. C., 139, 110 S. E., 863. They may be modified at any time before the trial of the action upon the application of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
3Cited by6 opinions
- Barber v. BarberSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Fogartie v. FogartieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Barber v. . BarberSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Oldham v. . OldhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Rock v. RockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.