William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GINSBURG.
GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:
Under the District of Columbia’s workers’ compensation regime, all employers (or their compensation carriers) contribute to a Special Fund from which the Secretary of Labor (Secretary) makes a variety of payments to injured workers. See 33 U.S.C. § 944. The Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), in 1983, stopped contributing to the Fund. WMATA asserted that its tax exempt status immunized it from the obligation to make Fund payments. The Secretary sued WMATA to collect arrearages; on cross-motions…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edye v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Graves v. New York Ex Rel. O'KeefeSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Massachusetts v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- In Re Suburban Motor Freight, Inc., Debtor. Stephen K. Yoder, Trustee v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- In Re Metro Transportation Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1990
- Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Public Utility Commission of the State of Oregon State of OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Bechtel Associates, P.C. And Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co. v. Sally T. Sweeney and Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, DolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1987
- Chicago & North Western Transportation Co. v. Webster County Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.