Legal Opinion
Bernbach v. Timex Corp.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 30, 1996No. CIV. 3:94CV224 (JBA)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS (Docs. 18, 23, 25, 72, & 98)
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Plaintiffs are owners of residential property adjoining a long-time manufacturing facility of defendant Timex Corporation in Middlebury, Connecticut. In 1989, Timex undertook an environmental evaluation of the facility and allegedly discovered groundwater contamination by a variety of hazardous substances. Timex did not notify governmental authorities or adjoining property-owners of this contamination, but retained defendant Roy F. Weston, Inc. (‘Weston”), an environmental consulting firm, for further assessment…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shore v. Town of StoningtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Daigle v. Shell Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Montinieri v. Southern New England Telephone, Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Calabrese v. McHughDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Kopperl v. BainDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Collins v. Olin Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2006
- Connecticut Pipe Trades Health Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2001
- Martin v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.