Grandstaff v. Brown
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from, Wyandotte District Court. Action brought by Brown against Grandstaff and wife and two other defendants, upon a note and mortgage. At the July Term, 1878, of the district court, the plaintiff had judgment against the defendants, and Grandstaff and wife bring the case here for review. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Valentine, J.:
This -was an action on a promissory note and a mortgage. The note was executed by Abraham Grand-staff, and the mortgage by Grandstaff and wife, and both were executed to James G. Brown. The note was an ordinary promissory note, dated May 25j 1872, for $500, due in one year after date, and drawing interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum. It was given for money lent. The mort*177gage was more than an ordinary mortgage. It was given not only to secure the payment of said promissory note, but :also to secure the performance of various…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mitchell v. MilhoanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
- Pape v. Capitol BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
- Missouri Valley R. R. v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
- Barkley v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
- Irwin v. PaulettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1863
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Love v. Kirkbride Drilling & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Mulhall v. MulhallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Young v. SeverySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Young v. Severy, AssigneeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.