Legal Opinion

Nelson v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 26, 1986No. 84-02707; A34757PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GILLETTE, P. J., Pro Tempore

Claimant seeks judicial review of a Worker’s Compensation Board order reversing the referee’s decision in claimant’s favor. The issue, one of first impression in Oregon, is whether employer-paid medical insurance and pension benefits should be included in the Workers’ Compensation Act definition of wages in the calculation of benefits. ORS 656.005(27).1 The Board held that they are not encompassed by the definition. We agree.

Claimant suffered a compensable injury on October 11, 1983. At the time of the injury, he was a member of the Oregon Public Employees Union.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation ProgramsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. State of Oregon v. BrantleyOregon Supreme Court · 1954

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. David Lowell Evenson v. Winnebago Industries, Inc. and Sentry Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 2016
  2. Whitlock v. Haney Seed Co.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Rainey v. MillsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1987
  4. Nelson v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State ex rel. Matheny v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API