Legal Opinion
United States v. St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 30, 1951No. Civ. No. 10283PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
By this action the government seeks to recover customs duties and internal revenue taxes from the surety on a warehouse entry -bond. A stipulation of all material facts has been filed, and the case is now before me on plaintiff’s and defendant’s, motions for summary judgment.
On June 22, 1943 Mark D. Leff, principal, imported 129 barrels of whiskey at the Port of Philadelphia. Leff filed with the Collector of Customs a warehouse entry bond No. 5613 in the penal sum of $61,200, on which bond defendant, St. Paul Mercury Indemnity Company, a Delaware corporation, was the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dumont v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- American Express Co. v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. De VisserDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
- Anglo-Californian Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- United States v. CampbellDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1952
- Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020
- Lahens v. AT&T Mobility Puerto Rico, Inc.District Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2020