Legal Opinion
Miller v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 31, 1987No. 2 CA-CV 5922PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Judge.
We are asked to review a City of Tucson ordinance dealing with outdoor signs and to determine whether or not appellee’s sign violates that ordinance. We agree with the trial court’s finding that it does not.
Appellee Clayton K. Miller III owns and operates a restaurant on Grant Road in Tucson. He advertises his restaurant by means of an A-frame sign in the parking lot of the shopping center in which his business is located. The 4' x 8' sign has been installed since at least 1975, prior to the date of the enactment of the present sign ordinance. The sign is permanently…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. Super. Ct., Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. SheplerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- DeMontiney v. Desert Manor Convalescent Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- State v. SalzmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. PintoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
- Sharpe v. Arizona Health Care Cost Containment SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State v. SeyrafiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Arizona Alliance for Retired Americans v. Kristin K. MayesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024