Legal Opinion

EX PARTE E.H. v. the State of Texas

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2020No. 18-0932Published

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ NO. 18-0932 ══════════ EX PARTE E.H. ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, dissenting. E.H. pleaded guilty to felony online solicitation of a minor. Expunction of arrest records is only available to him if “there was no court-ordered community supervision under Chapter 42A for the offense.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 55.01(a)(2). The Court acknowledges what it calls the “historical reality”: E.H. served…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  3. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Ex parte FournierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API