EX PARTE E.H. v. the State of Texas
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS ══════════ NO. 18-0932 ══════════ EX PARTE E.H. ══════════════════════════════════════════ ON PETITION FOR REVIEW FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS ══════════════════════════════════════════ JUSTICE BLACKLOCK, dissenting. E.H. pleaded guilty to felony online solicitation of a minor. Expunction of arrest records is only available to him if “there was no court-ordered community supervision under Chapter 42A for the offense.” TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. § 55.01(a)(2). The Court acknowledges what it calls the “historical reality”: E.H. served…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. v. Glyn-JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Cadena Comercial USA Corp. D/B/A Oxxo v. Texas Alcoholic Beverage CommissionTexas Supreme Court · 2017
- Ex parte FournierCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.