Legal Opinion

Apexxus LLC v. OptumRx, Inc.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 22, 2025No. 4:25-cv-00049Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 APEXXUS LLC, Case No. 25-cv-00049-DMR 8 Plaintiff, ORDER ON MOTION TO COMPEL 9 v. ARBITRATION 10 OPTUMRX, INC., Re: Dkt. Nos. 11, 12, 19 11 Defendant. 12 Plaintiff Apexxus LLC (“Apexxus”) filed this lawsuit against Defendant OptumRx, Inc. 13 (“Optum”) alleging breach of contract, breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing, quantum 14 meruit, and other related state law claims. [Docket No. 1-2 (First Amended Complaint, “FAC”).] 15 Optum now moves to compel arbitration. [Docket Nos. 11 (Mot.); 32 (Reply).] Apexxus…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API