Legal Opinion

Blankenship v. Acton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided June 25, 2004No. 2003-CA-000903-MRPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KNOPF, Judge.

Johnny K. Blankenship appeals from a judgment of the Pulaski Circuit Court which enjoined him from blocking access to an old public road. We agree with Blankenship that a public road which is not a county or state road may be abandoned without formal governmental action. However, the trial court also correctly found that Blankenship did not have a right to obstruct the Actons’ use of the road. Hence, we reverse in part, and affirm in part.

The material facts of this case are not in dispute. The appellant, Blankenship, and the appellees, Claude J. Acton, Janie Acton, and…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Riley v. BuchananCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  2. Cole v. GilvinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2001
  3. City of Pioneer Village v. Bullitt County Ex Rel. Bullitt Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sarver v. County of Allen Ex Rel. Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Freeman v. DuggerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nash v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Kentucky Properties Holding LLC v. SproulKentucky Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Kentucky Properties Holding LLC v. Donald SproulKentucky Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Michael Harlan v. Doris Dean WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2021
  5. Nash v. Campbell County Fiscal CourtKentucky Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API