Legal Opinion
Omakaze Sushi Restaurant, Inc. v. Ngan Kam Lee
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 2, 2008PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in denying the motion of the defendants (hereinafter the appellants) for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the plaintiff from performing any construction or renovation work upon the subject premises.
A party seeking the drastic remedy of a preliminary injunction must establish a clear right to that relief under the law and the undisputed facts (see Gagnon Bus Co., Inc. v Vallo Transp., Ltd., 13 AD3d 334 [2004]). The burden of proof is on the movant to demonstrate a likelihood of success on the merits, the prospect of irreparable injury if…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doe v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Related Properties, Inc. v. Town Board of HarrisonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Gagnon Bus Co. v. Vallo Transportation, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- Advanced Digital Security Solutions, Inc. v. Samsung Techwin Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arcamone-Makinano v. Britton Property, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Wheaton/TMW Fourth Avenue, LP v. New York City Department of BuildingsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Board of Managers v. NehrichAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Brach v. Harmony Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Board of Managers of Bond Parc Condominium v. BroxmeyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.