Uusi, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE A SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER
WILLIAMS, Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Third-Party Defendant AM General, LLC’s (“AM General”) motion for leave to supplement its answer to assert the affirmative defense of inequitable conduct. In its proposed supplemental answer, AM General alleges that the patentee UUSI and its counsel before the Patent .Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) misrepresented the expiration date of two claims of the patent at issue in filings during the institution stage of inter partes review. AM General…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Precision Instrument Manufacturing Co. v. Automotive Maintenance MacHinery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v. Hartford-Empire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Keystone Driller Co. v. General Excavator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Graham Packaging Company, L.P. v. Ring Container Technologies, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025