Brakemeier v. Wittek
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Allen and Joyce Brakemeier appeal from a judgment for respondent John Wittek and contend the trial court erred in concluding execution must be returned unsatisfied as a prerequisite for a creditor to bring suit on a debtor’s equitable assets. We affirm.
FACTS
The Brakemeiers, judgment creditors of Howard Padratzik, brought this action against Wittek to collect on a promissory note from Wittek to Padratzik.
On August 10, 1978, Padratzik loaned Wittek $15,000. In return, Wittek gave Padratzik a promissory note for $15,000 (due February 7, 1979); a security agreement; 112…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Wadsworth v. SchisselbauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Lind v. O. N. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Moffatt v. TuttleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
- John Deere Dubuque Works of Deere & Co. v. MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987
3Cited by2 opinions
- All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Columbia Associates v. Propper Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987