Legal Opinion

Brakemeier v. Wittek

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 6, 1986No. C2-85-2142PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NIERENGARTEN, Judge.

Allen and Joyce Brakemeier appeal from a judgment for respondent John Wittek and contend the trial court erred in concluding execution must be returned unsatisfied as a prerequisite for a creditor to bring suit on a debtor’s equitable assets. We affirm.

FACTS

The Brakemeiers, judgment creditors of Howard Padratzik, brought this action against Wittek to collect on a promissory note from Wittek to Padratzik.

On August 10, 1978, Padratzik loaned Wittek $15,000. In return, Wittek gave Padratzik a promissory note for $15,000 (due February 7, 1979); a security agreement; 112…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Pierce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Wadsworth v. SchisselbauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  3. Lind v. O. N. Johnson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
  4. Moffatt v. TuttleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
  5. John Deere Dubuque Works of Deere & Co. v. MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. All Finish Concrete, Inc. v. EricksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
  2. Columbia Associates v. Propper Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API