Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Davis Mill Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1896No. 6572PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from the district court of Lancaster county. Tried below before Strode, J. See opinion for references to authorities.

1Opinion of the Court

Iryine, 0.

The Davis Mill Company began an action in the district court of Lancaster county against Fredericks, Bailey & Co., and in said action caused an attachment to be issued and levied upon certain property, as the property of Fredericks, Bailey & Co., which was in the possession of Cooper at the time of the levy. Thereafter, Cooper, as principal, and John B. Wright, as surety, executed, under section 20'6 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the following-undertaking:

*421“Whereas, Sam McClay, sheriff of Lancaster county, has, on this 21st day of September, 1891, attached certain goods and…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Murphy v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cornell v. . DakinNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  3. Burk v. WebbMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  4. Learned v. BryantMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1816
  5. Spencer v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1828

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cermak v. SchaafIllinois Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Sloan v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API