Parr v. City of Birmingham
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Justice.
Appellant, a minor suing by next friend, sought damages against the City of Birmingham for injuries sustained when a wrought iron plaque fell on and broke his leg while he was in the Birmingham Art Museum which is located in the City Hall. The demurrer to appellant’s complaint was sustained; he took an involuntary non suit because of the adverse ruling of the court and has appealed.
The real question before us is whether the operation of the museum by the City of Birmingham is a corporate act or an act in the exercise of a governmental function.
The statute authorizing museums…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Maxmilian v. . MayorNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
- City of Tuscaloosa v. FittsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Williams v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- City of Bay Minette v. QUINELYSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- McSheridan v. City of TalladegaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Port of Seattle v. International Longshoremen's & Warehousemen's UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1958
- City of Decatur v. ParhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
- Dixon v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Hillis v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1963
- Jones v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.