Shannon v. Gourley
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ARONSON, J.
Vikki Leone Shannon appeals the denial of her writ of mandate challenging the Department of Motor Vehicles’ (DMV) suspension of her driver’s license. Shannon contends the blood-alcohol test results should not have been admitted into evidence because the requisite foundation had not been established. For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I
On October 26, 2000, around 12:30 p.m., California Highway Patrol Officer Sparso was dispatched to investigate an accident. At the scene, Sparso observed a Mazda MX3 partially underneath a Volkswagen’s rear bumper. Shannon, sitting in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Lake v. ReedCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Davenport v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Imachi v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- McKinney v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Burge v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Manriquez v. GourleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Molenda v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Coffey v. ShiomotoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
- Najera v. ShiomotoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Hernandez v. GutierrezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.