Legal Opinion

McClung v. Louisville & N. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 15, 1951No. 6 Div. 90PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FOSTER, Justice.

This is an appeal from a final decree denying relief to complainants and dismissing their bill. The bill sought an abatement of certain operations which are claimed to constitute a nuisance. Complainants, appellants here, have homes situated on Lanark Road in Birmingham, on the southern slope of Red Mountain overlooking English Village, also called Hedona.

About fifty' years before complainants filed their bill, the Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, a respondent here, constructed a branch line from its main line to Boyles. There were several ore mines then in operation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Richards v. Washington Terminal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Hamilton v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  3. Branyon v. KirkSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. 1st Avenue Coal & Lumber Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Alabama Power Co. v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Davis v. Hanson Aggregates Southeast, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  2. City of Birmingham v. ScoginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Downey v. JacksonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  4. Duncan v. City of TuscaloosaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
  5. Strickland v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API