Legal Opinion
Twist v. Kay
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 19, 1967No. 41498PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVISON, Justice.
Defendant in error, William E. Kay, hereinafter referred to as petitioner, as owner of Lot Eleven (11) of Block 111, in Nichols Hills Suburban Tracts Addition to Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, (9208 North May Avenue) filed his application with the City Building Superintendent of Oklahoma City (William J. Burkes), as respondent, requesting that he be issued a building permit to erect a one story addition to his property and alter and convert the existing residence thereon to a one story office building. Petitioner’s application was denied.
Petitioner appealed to the Board of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Oklahoma City v. HarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941
- City of Tulsa v. SwansonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961
- Application of ShadidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1951
- In Re Pierce's AppealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
3Cited by16 opinions
- Nucholls v. Board of Adjustment of City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1977
- Vinson v. MedleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- O'ROURKE v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Hammock v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Banks v. City of BethanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1975
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.