LaCosta v. Prudential Insurance of America
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT.*
Linda Lee LaCosta appeals from the judgment of dismissal entered after demurrer to her complaint was sustained without leave to amend. Notice of appeal was filed prior to the entry of judgment; however, we elect to treat said notice as filed immediately thereafter and thus timely. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 2(c).)
Appellant, as beneficiary, sought to recover proceeds under a nonoccupational vehicle accident provision contained in an insurance policy issued by respondent on the life of appellant’s deceased husband. The complaint alleged that appellant’s husband was killed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co., of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1970
- Jirousek v. Prudential Ins. Co. of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Prestenback v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
- Safeco Insurance v. ViethCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Lightner v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1969
3Cited by1 opinion
- Paul v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1977