Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Weber

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1916No. Appeal, No. 386PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal, No. 386, Oct. T., 1915, by defendant, from order of Q. S. Philadelphia Co., March T., 1915, No. 694, overruling demurrer in case of Commonwealth v. Lércy Weber. Error assigned was in overruling demurrer to indictment directing the defendant to plead.

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

The indictment charges the defendant with attempted subornation of perjury. A demurrer was filed in which the defendant added “saving to himself all manner and benefit of technicalities, and especially the right to plead to the indictment and a trial by his peers and the law of the land, in the event that the said demurrer should not be sustained.” The court “overruled the demurrer ; the defendant was directed to plead to the indictment.” The contingency anticipated by the defendant is now presented, and his plea to the indictment is directed by the court in answer to his prayer.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GaborSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  2. Richardson v. RichardsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Frank P. Miller Paper Co. v. Keystone Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  2. Commonwealth of Penna. v. GatesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  3. Commonwealth v. State TreasurerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Commonwealth v. GreenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Commonwealth v. ShieldsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API