Legal Opinion

Furber v. Williams-Flower Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1907PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lawrence County. Hon. W. G. Ricr, Judge. Action by George M. Furber against the Williams-Flower Company and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, P. J.

This action by a judgment creditor of the Williams-Flower Compan}'-, on behalf of himself and others, to set aside a transfer and subsequent mortgage of corporate property and to secure the appointment of a receiver, was instituted after an execution had been issued and returned nulla bona. Whether the chattel mortgage executed and delivered by the transferee, S. A. Flower, to the respondent, First National Bank of Deadwood, is valid as to the creditors of the company, is the ultimate question to be determined on this appeal.

It is shown by the unchallenged findings of fact, upon which ?ill…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sanger v. UptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. Lyons-Thomas Hardware Co. v. Perry Stove Manufacturing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Ford v. Plankinton BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Appleton v. TurnbullSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1891
  5. Biddle Purchasing Co. v. Port Townsend Steel Wire & Nail Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Sioux Falls Trust & Savings Bank v. Homer W. Johnson Co.United States District Court · 1927
  2. Kirkup v. Anaconda Amusement Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Rice v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
  4. Bank of Springfield v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Rogers v. Gladiator Gold Min. & Mill. Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1907

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API