Legal Opinion

United States v. Cunningham

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 4, 2009No. 08-2901, 08-2931PublishedCited by 103 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the consolidated appeals of Derek Cunningham and Norman Thomas. Their appeals arise from the same prosecution and raise the same purely legal issue: whether a district court, in reducing a’s sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 8582(c)(2), has authority under United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) to reduce a’s sentence beyond the retroactive Guidelines amendment range. For the reasons explained below, we hold that a district court does not have authority to do so and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

I…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Harris v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by103 opinions

  1. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. GoodwynCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2010
  3. United States v. DoublinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. United States v. WoodsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
  5. United States v. MarionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API