Legal Opinion
United States v. Plugh
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 8, 2011No. 10-2815-crPublishedCited by 67 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON, Circuit Judge:
The instant appeal arises from the suppression of certain custodial statements made by defendant-appellee Gordon Plugh shortly after his arrest. The district court (Siragusa, /.), suppressed these statements after concluding that Plugh had successfully invoked his Miranda rights by declining to sign a waiver-of-rights form, United States v. Plugh, 522 F.Supp.2d 481, 495-96 (W.D.N.Y.2007), and a panel of this Court affirmed, United States v. Plugh, 576 F.3d 135, 137 (2d Cir.2009) (hereinafter, “Plugh I”). Specifically, the Plugh I majority concluded that the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. David Hooper Climer, Jr.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- United States v. BindayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- The Dow Chemical Company v. Nova Chemicals CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Weslowski v. ZugibeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- United States v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.