Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Board of County Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 4, 1932No. 30,535PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action to recover damages for injuries suffered by Nannie Arnold, the wife of John Arnold, on highway No. 75, near the line between Coffey county and Osage county. It is brought under the statute making the county liable for damages sustained through the defects in a highway where five days’ actual notice or knowledge of the defect has been brought to the chairman of the board of county commissioners. The defect in question was a ditch or hole in the highway at the end of a culvert.

One of the questions raised is that there…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Watson v. Parker TownshipSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  3. McFarland ex rel. Dougherty v. Township of EmporiaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  4. Martin v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1914

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. DiBenedetto v. Flora TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Goodrich v. County of KalamazooMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Bohrer v. Kansas State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. DiBenedetto v. Flora TownshipIllinois Supreme Court · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API