Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance v. Adamez ex rel. Adamez
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided April 9, 2015No. Civil No. 14-3430(DSD/FLN)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1082ORDER
DAVID S. DOTY, District Judge.
- This matter is before the court upon the motion for judgment on the pleadings by plaintiff Metropolitan Property and Casualty Insurance Company (Metropolitan). Based on a review of the file; record, and proceedings herein, and for the following reasons, the court grants the motion.
BACKGROUND
This insurance-coverage dispute arises out of Metropolitan’s denial of the claim for losses resulting from an accident at its insured’s daycare. Defendant Kelly McConnach operates a licensed daycare, A Barrol of Fun Daycare, out of her home in Cottage Grove, Minnesota.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Braden v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Ashley County, Ark. v. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Miller v. ShugartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance Company v. NewmanDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020