Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Reeves

California Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 2005No. S110887Published

1Dissent

CHIN, J.,

Dissenting.—Throughout this proceeding, the parties have offered two conflicting constructions of Penal Code section 2933.1, subdivision (a) (hereafter section 2933.1(a)).1 Petitioner argues that the 15 percent sentence credit limit under that statute applies only to the sentence he received for his conviction of assault with a deadly weapon—which qualifies under section 667.5, subdivision (c)(8), as a violent felony because he inflicted great bodily injury on his victim—and does not apply to the sentence he received for possession of a controlled substance, which does not qualify as…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. ChampionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. People v. MendozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. People v. GarciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API