Middleton v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BILL CANNON, Justice
(Assigned).
Sean Middleton appeals from the denial by the trial court of his motion to suppress all the evidence in the charge against him for possession of marihuana of more than 50 but less than 2000 pounds. Appellant pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea bargain with the State, and the trial court assessed appellant’s punishment at three years imprisonment. In three points of error, appellant contends the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress because his warrantless arrest and subsequent search of his luggage were unlawful under the state and federal…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Vargas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000
- Sandoval v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2001
- Arnold v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
- City of Amarillo v. Premium Standard Farms, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2007
- Danny Clement v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.