Legal Opinion

Vale v. duPont

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 21, 1936No. 1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*258Wolcott, Chancellor, delivering the opinion of the Court:

The assignments of error raise two questions which will be stated and answered as follows:

1. Was the exchange of La France shares for Postum shares a taxable transaction?

This question is to be answered in the light of the income' tax statute of this State as the same existed in 1928. The pertinent provision of the statute is found in Section 1 of Article 1, Chapter 9, 32 Delaware Laws, ap*259proved March 29, 1921, wherein net income is defined. The provision is as follows:

“The phrase ‘net income’ means the aggregate of all gains, profits,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Eisner, Internal Revenue Collector v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  5. United States v. PhellisSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Thorpe v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  3. Fidanque v. American Maracaibo Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1952
  4. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Property Appraisal DepartmentNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971
  5. Mitchell Bros. Truck Lines v. HillOregon Supreme Court · 1961

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API