Roberts v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
ROBERT L. BROWN, Justice.
|i Appellant Karl Douglas Roberts appeals the Polk County Circuit Court’s denial without a hearing of his petition for Rule 37.5 relief. On appeal, Roberts asserts that he presented factual claims that merited a hearing, or, in the alternative, that he presented claims upon which this court should grant postconviction relief. The State raises the issue of a bar to any postconviction relief, because neither the circuit court nor this court has subject-matter jurisdiction to adjudge Roberts’s petition. We agree with the State, and we dismiss Roberts’s appeal for lack of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
- Greene v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Roberts v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Engram v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
- Karl D. Roberts v. State of ArkansasSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2020
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015