Legal Opinion

Toland v. Strohl

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 5, 1961No. 19340PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Doyle

This action is before us on a writ of error to the district court wherein Strohl sought and obtained extraordinary relief under Rule 106 from an adverse judgment of Toland, as justice of the peace. The district court ruled that Toland was without jurisdiction to hear the case. Toland seeks review.

Strohl was involved in an automobile accident shortly before midnight on May 10, 1959, on U.S. Highway 24, East of Vona in Kit Carson County, Colorado. A Highway Patrolman, called to the scene by a passerby, arrived after midnight on May 11, 1959, where he interviewed both parties and observed the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  3. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Palko v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. City of Canon City v. MerrisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1958

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Nelson v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  2. Hazelwood v. SaulSupreme Court of Colorado · 1980
  3. People v. NelsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2015
  4. Prairie Dog Advocates v. City of LakewoodColorado Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Weck v. District Court of Second Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API