Legal Opinion

Darrow v. Scullin

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1877PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from, Labette District Court. Foreclosure of mortgage, brought by Scullin, as plaintiff. Trial, and judgment for plaintiff, and against Darrow and wife, defendants, at the November Term 1875. The defendants bring the case here.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

In September 1875, the defendant in error commenced an action in the district court to recover judgment on three promissory notes, and foreclose a mortgage given to secure the same, each being signed by both defendants in error. The notes and mortgage were dated 20th May 1874; the former, each for the payment of $753.33, with twelve per cent, interest after maturity, together with reasonable attorney-fees, and were payable in one, two, and three years from date respectively. The mortgage contained this stipulation:

“This grant is intended as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Muzzy v. KnightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1905
  2. Durham v. RascoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Phillips v. Williams Et Ux.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Wilson v. KirchanWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. F. B. Collins Inv. Co. v. SannerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API