Legal Opinion
In re Estate of Clos
California Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1895No. L. A. No. 32PublishedCited by 22 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. W. H. Clark, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Fleet, J.
Among the items of the account filed by the executrix of the estate were these:
“ By payment to Frank J. Oapitan, for architectural services, general contract, brick work, plumbing, etc., for repairing and building stables at No. 24 Aliso street.....$2,611.74
“By services of said Oapitan for preparing plans for said building.................. 130.53”
Upon the settlement of the account the court below rejected and disallowed these items, upon the ground, as stated in the bill of exceptions, “ that the said items were not a proper charge of the said executrix against the said estate”; and the only…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In Re the Accounting of NilesNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- In re MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Upson v. BadeauNew York Surrogate's Court · 1854
3Cited by22 opinions
- Clary v. ClaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re the Estate of BurkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Clanton v. CriteserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- In Re Estate of HincheonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Fulmer v. Pacific Southwest Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.