Legal Opinion

DuVal v. City of Little Rock

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 25, 1957No. 5-1274PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sam Robinson, Associate Justice.

The City of Little Rock owns its water supply system. The City is growing rapidly and there is an urgent need for expanding and improving the water supply. In order to raise money for this purpose, the City seeks to issue Revenue Bonds under an Indenture. The appellants, George E. DuVal, property owner, taxpayer and water customer, and Curtis Barham, owner of Water Works Bonds issued in 1936, filed this suit to enjoin the issuance of new bonds to finance the contemplated improvements, extensions and betterments.

The City demurred to the complaint. The trial…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Talkington v. TurnbowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  2. Arkansas Bond Company v. HartonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1935
  3. Ferris v. Stewart, County JudgeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  4. Bay Special Consolidated School District No. 21 v. HallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Summey v. City of AmesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1960
  2. Adams v. PritchardIdaho Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API