Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided June 10, 2002No. S02A0159PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

Appellant Avonna Smith appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the indictment against him due to an alleged violation of his right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Applying the criteria of Barker v. Wingo, 1 we determine that Smith has not established a deprivation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial, and we affirm.

Appellant was taken into custody on the underlying charges by Fulton County officials on October 1, 1997. 2 Appellant and his co-defendants, Gilbert and Thomas, were indicted on October 7, 1997,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Boseman v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  3. Nelloms v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001
  4. Jackson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  5. Perry v. MitchellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. OllivierWashington Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Williams v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  3. Brewington v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  4. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Christian v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API