Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Milmine

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 9, 1909No. Gen. No. 14,533PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Bill in chancery. Appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. George A. Dupuy, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Smith

court.

Many errors are relied upon in appellant’s brief and argument for a reversal of the decree of the Superior Court. It will not be necessary, in our opinion, to discuss all of them specifically in disposing of the case. The main object and purpose of the bill is to free the 222 shares of the capital stock of Borden’s Condensed Milk Company, of which appellant Johnson is the owner as between him and Probst, from the claim of lien of Milmine, Bodman & Company and prevent the transfer of said stock to them, or the sale of the stocks to satisfy the claims of Milmine, Bodman & Company against…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Board of Trade of Chicago v. Christie Grain & Stock Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Clews v. JamiesonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Pope v. HankeIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Pixley v. BoyntonIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  5. Cleage v. LaidleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States Gypsum Co. v. FarollAppellate Court of Illinois · 1938
  2. Howison v. Mechanics Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1936
  3. Ehrlich v. RothschildAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Estate of Towne v. Claim of BuckleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1923
  5. Ennis v. EdgarAppellate Court of Illinois · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API