Brislin v. Carnegie Steel Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania
In Equity. Suit for infringement of letters patent No. 345,953, ■ granted to John Brislin and Antoine Vinnac July 20, 1886, and No. 352,748, granted to Patrick F. Hanley and Francis N. Richey November 16, 1886, both relating to a feeding mechanism for rolling mills. On final hearing:
1Opinion of the Court
BUFFINGTON, District Judge.
The complainants, John Brislin and Antoine Vinnac, filed this bill in equity against the Carnegie Steel Company, Limited, charging infringement of the first and second claims of patent No. 345,953, granted them July 20, 1886, for feeding mechanism for rolling mills. The bill also charges infringement of the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth claims of patent No. 352,748, granted November 16, 1886, to Patrick F. Hanley and Francis N. Richey for a feed table for rolling mills, and thereafter assigned to complainants. The defenses are invalidity of the patents and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- MacHine Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Dolbear v. American Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Western Electric Co. v. LaRueSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Independent Electric Co. v. Jeffrey Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio · 1896
3Cited by1 opinion
- Oregon Woodenware Mfg. Co. v. MurrayDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1914