Legal Opinion
United States v. Bortnovsky
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 26, 1988No. 88 Cr. 71 (MBM)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MUKASEY, District Judge.
The defendants have moved to dismiss Counts Three through Eight of the indictment as barred by the statute of limitations because the indictment was not returned within five years of the commission of the acts constituting the underlying offenses. 1 For the reasons set forth below, the motion is granted.
I
These defendants and one other were charged initially in indictment 86 Cr. 661 with various acts of racketeering and fraud in connection with an alleged scheme to collect insurance by committing arson and filing false theft claims. After these…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- United States v. Frank Grady and John JankowskiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Alexander Bortnovsky, A/K/A "Sasha," Leonid BrazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Marvin FeinbergCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Marshall M. Powell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. MoriartyDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1971
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Alexander Bortnovsky, A/K/A "Sasha," and Leonid BrazCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Raphael Podde, Gabriel ReguerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. BenjaminDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1993
- State v. PadillaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2025
- Strong v. Rushmore Loan Management ServicesDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2025