Lathrop v. Henkels & McCoy, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
MASTERSON, District Judge.
This matter is before us on defendant’s Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or, in the alternative, for a new trial. The plaintiff in this diversity action was injured when the automobile he was driving struck a barricade and a pile of pipe on West Chester Pike. The defendant was laying the pipe for the Philadelphia Electric Company in the medial strip of the highway.
According to plaintiff’s testimony, he was proceeding west at approximately 35 miles per hour on West Chester Pike in the right hand lane 1 when he passed a sign warning him…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Stevenson v. Pennsylvania Sports & Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Kite v. JonesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Jones v. Atlantic Refining Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1944
- Rich v. Petersen Truck Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Metro v. Long Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
- Dietterle v. HardingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980