Legal Opinion

People v. Durant

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1999No. D030198PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HUFFMAN, J.

Following the holdings of People v. Hendrix (1997) 16 Cal.4th 508 [66 Cal.Rptr.2d 431, 941 P.2d 64] and People v. Deloza (1998) *139618 Cal.4th 585 [76 Cal.Rptr.2d 255, 957 P.2d 945], in this case we consider what additional factors may be involved in determining the application of the narrow statutory exception to the mandatory imposition of consecutive terms for multiple current offenses of qualified repeat felons under the three strikes law.

In 1996, Michael Anthony Durant was convicted by a jury of residential burglary (Pen. Code,1 §§ 459/460) and two attempted residental…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. People v. GordonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  4. People v. MontoyaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. People v. WeidertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. People v. BrionesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  3. People v. LawrenceCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  4. People v. JenkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  5. People v. Hines CA3California Court of Appeal · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API