Cutuk v. Hayes/Gallardo, Inc.
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cunningham
Pursuant to the Structural Work Act (the Act) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1987, ch. 48, par. 60 et seq.) the plaintiff, Harry Cutuk, filed this action against Hayes/Gallardo, Inc., and other defendants. Hayes/Gallardo (defendant) moved for summary judgment, based upon the fact that Cutuk was a sole proprietor. The trial court denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment, but certified the following question to the reviewing court: “Is a sole proprietor a protected person within the meaning of the Structural Work Act where the defendant had some control and/or supervision over the sole proprietor?” The…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gannon v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1961
- Simmons v. Union Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1984
- McGovern v. StandishIllinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Puttman v. May Excavating Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1987
- Bryntesen v. Carroll Construction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Slavoljub Damnjanovic and Seretena Damnjanovic v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1993
- Hesselink v. R.L. Perlow Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Martin v. Ortho PharmaceuticalsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Baldwin v. Twin Rivers ClubAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- Ciccone v. Dominick's Finer Foods, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.