Legal Opinion

Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Schenectady Coating Corp.

New York County Courts

Decided February 16, 1940PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiddle, J.

The question is whether the City Court of the city of Schenectady acquires jurisdiction of a non-resident defendant by service of process upon it where the plaintiff likewise is a nonresident and where neither plaintiff nor defendant have a place of business within the territorial jurisdiction of the City Court of the city of Schenectady.

This action was commenced by the issuance of a summons out of said court and the service thereof on the defendant, Schenectady Coating Corporation. This defendant has a place of business in the town of Rotterdam, adjoining the territorial limits of the city…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Worthington v. London Guarantee & Accident Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  2. People v. HenriesNew York Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cole v. Phelps, New York County Courts1931
  4. Gahagan v. FairbanksBinghamton City Court · 1933

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re HagadornNew York Family Court · 1958
  2. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. Schenectady Coating Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1940
  3. Cleveland Mortuary Supply Co. v. CoxUtica City Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API