Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pullum v. Consolidated School District No. 5

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided November 13, 1950No. 41752PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOHLING, C.

[ 703] This is a proceeding in mandamus to collect the judgment recovered for services as a teacher in Irma Pullum v. Consolidated School District No. 5 of Stoddard county, Missouri, 357 Mo. 858, 211 S. W. 2d 30. The School District and its officials, respondents below and appellants here, contend, among other things, that the funds which the teacher, relator below and respondent here, claims are available for the discharge of her judgment may not be applied thereto under our statutes. Thus, the issues presented for review involve a construction of the revenue laws of this State…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sturdivant Bank v. Stoddard CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Douglas County v. Bank of Ava.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  3. Pullum v. Consolidated School District No. 5Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
  4. Ballard v. Standard Printing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1947
  5. State ex rel. Seeligman v. HaysSupreme Court of Missouri · 1872

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Jenks v. JenksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Strong v. CribbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  3. State ex rel. Niess v. JunkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. State Ex Rel. Strong v. CribbSupreme Court of Missouri · 1954
  5. State of Missouri, Ex Rel., Jeff Peters and John Newman v. Scott Fitzpatrick, Treasurer, State of Missouri and Colleen Joern Vetter, Director of the Missouri Division of Workers' CompensationMissouri Court of Appeals · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API