Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Niess v. Junkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided March 1, 1978No. 10077PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOGAN, Judge.

This is a proceeding in mandamus. Rela-tors, suing as an unincorporated association pursuant to Rule 52.10, V.A.M.R.,1 sought construction and enforcement of § 163.-031(9), which, during the time here involved, regulated the disbursement of school foundation funds2 and read:

“[A] school district shall spend for teachers’ salaries each year at least eighty percent of the state school funds received under this section that year as provided by section 163.061 and as much of the revenue produced by local tax levies as was spent for teachers’ salaries the previous year. In the event a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hadley v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. School District of Oakland v. School District of JoplinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1937
  3. Stanton v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1911
  4. Peters v. Board of Education of the Reorganized School District No. 5 of St. Charles CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. School District of Mexico, Missouri, No. 59 v. Maple Grove School District, No. 56Supreme Court of Missouri · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Lack v. MeltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Lack v. MeltonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API