Legal Opinion

Fallon v. Humes

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 30, 1981No. 78-2979-E-2, CA 17392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Appealing plaintiffs appeal from the denial of a mandatory injunction requiring the individual defendants to remove a garage they built on a portion of the comer lot they own at the junction of Prospect and Roca Streets in Ashland. Plaintiffs allege that the garage was built too close to Prospect Street, and the present dispute centers around the precise location of the boundaries of that street. Plaintiffs assign error to the trial court’s finding that they failed to establish that the City of Ashland was ever the owner of a right-of-way along the south side of Prospect Street for street and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. SWEET v. Irrigation Canal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Miller v. Roy W. Heinrich & Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Nodine v. UnionOregon Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mid-Valley Resources, Inc. v. Foxglove Properties, LLPCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. Marriage of HillMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Marriage of RohrichMontana Supreme Court · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API