Legal Opinion
Hauth v. Giant Portland Cement Co.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided April 15, 1953PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
96 A.2d 233 (1953)
HAUTH
v.
GIANT PORTLAND CEMENT CO. et al.
Court of Chancery of Delaware, New Castle.
April 15, 1953.
James R. Morford and William Marvel (of Morford, Bennethum & Marvel, Wilmington, and Leo Brady (of Gordon, Brady, Caffrey & Keller), New York City, for plaintiff.
David F. Anderson (of Berl, Potter & Anderson), Wilmington, and A. O. Dawson (of Dorr, Hand & Dawson), New York City, for defendants.
BRAMHALL, Vice Chancellor.
Plaintiff sought to enjoin defendant corporation and certain of its officers and directors from proceeding with the election of directors at the annual meeting of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Atterbury v. Consolidated Coppermines Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
- Hexter v. Columbia Baking Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1929
- Hand v. Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1944
- Hauth v. Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1953
- McLain v. Lanova Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berlin v. Emerald PartnersSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
- Vanadium Corp. of America v. Susquehanna CorporationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1962
- Keough v. KittlemanWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Heffner v. Union National Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Heffner v. Union National Bank And Trust CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.