Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Nowell & Son

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 2, 1928No. 12032PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CONNER, O. J.

The proceedings now before us were set in motion by appellant,.-W, W. Hudson, on August 11, 1927, by filing a pleading in the justice court of precinct No. 1, Cooke county, styled “Motion of Defendant to Set Aside Alias Execution and the Sale of Realty Thereunder.” It appears from the record that on April 4, 1927, the court in which the motion was filed entered a judgment against W. W. Hudson in favor of “No-well & Son,” as plaintiffs, for the sum of $165.53,. together with interest and $7.25 costs; that by virtue of said judgment an alias execution had issued on the 8th day of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Garza v. KenedyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
  2. Amarillo Commercial Co. v. Chicago, R. I. & G. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  3. Campbell v. RichardsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Riley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
  2. State v. KinghamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1963
  3. in Re Joseph Robert Riley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011
  4. in Re Joseph Robert Riley, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API